57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Michelin Primacy 4+

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Anzahl der Tests
21
16
4
1
13
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
5.5
3.3
1.0
4.3
Neuester Test
2024
2023
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
165
153
40
66
123

Nass

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich