57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
21
16
18
3
5
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
5.5
6.1
3.7
2.8
Neuester Test
2024
2023
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
165
153
47
36
139

Nass

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich