57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
21
18
10
3
6
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#2
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
6.1
6.0
3.7
4.7
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
165
47
109
36
146

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen