57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Firestone RoadhawkObere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.2
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVPremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

9.2
R16 – R22
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
21
3
18
5
28
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
3.7
6.1
2.2
2.3
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
165
36
47
63
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste -Reifen für ElektrofahrzeugeBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Auch vergleichen

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNFirestone Roadhawk vs Semperit Speed-Life 3Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.ZiexFalken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXTFalken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6Falken e.Ziex vs Michelin E.Primacy

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen