57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Cooper Zeon CS8 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Cooper
Zeon CS8
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
21
14
18
5
4
Optimale Position
#2
#9
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
19.7
6.1
2.2
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
165
147
47
63
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Cooper Zeon CS8
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Cooper Zeon CS8
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Cooper Zeon CS8
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Cooper Zeon CS8
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Cooper Zeon CS8
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Cooper Zeon CS8
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Cooper Zeon CS8
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Cooper Zeon CS8
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Cooper Zeon CS8
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Cooper Zeon CS8
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Cooper Zeon CS8
49%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Cooper Zeon CS8
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Cooper Zeon CS8
43%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen