57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
21
36
18
5
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
3.1
6.1
4.8
Neuester Test
2024
2023
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
165
303
47
158

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Nassfahrverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
71%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Trockenleistung
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
62%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
100%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen