Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Roadhawk

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Anzahl der Tests

21

14

3

5

3

Optimale Position

#2

#8

#2

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

11.9

13.4

3.3

2.2

3.7

Neuester Test

2024

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

164

153

40

63

34

Nass

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - quer

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - längs

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Nassbremsen

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Handling - nass

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Kreisbahn nass

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Seitenführung

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Trocken

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Trockenbremsen

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Handling - trocken

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Komfort

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Außengeräusch

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Innengeräusche

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Komfort

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kosten

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rollwiderstand

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kilometerstand

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Preis-Wert

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex

Roadhawk

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen