56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Firestone RoadhawkObere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
BFGoodrich AdvantageObere-Mittelklasse
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
21
14
3
26
Optimale Position
#2
#8
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
13.4
3.3
2.2
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
164
153
40
66

Nass

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Nassleistung
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
45%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Trockenleistung
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
35%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich