56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Anzahl der Tests
21
14
3
36
Optimale Position
#2
#8
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
13.4
3.3
3.1
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2023
Verfügbare Größen
164
153
40
296

Nass

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Nassleistung
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Trockenleistung
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich