57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
6
5
18
5
4
3
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
4.7
2.2
6.1
4.8
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
146
63
47
158
40
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen