57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multiseason 2 gegen Viking Fourtech gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multiseason 2
Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
13
5
18
1
28
Optimale Position
#6
#11
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.9
17.0
6.1
1.0
2.3
Neuester Test
2025
2021
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
61
32
47
66
67

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multiseason 2
66%
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multiseason 2
77%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multiseason 2
48%
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Schnee
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Schnee Handling
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Schneetraktion
Firestone Multiseason 2
87%
Viking Fourtech
51%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Firestone Multiseason 2
86%
Viking Fourtech
82%
Kosten
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Multiseason 2
79%
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Komfort
Firestone Multiseason 2
73%
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Komfort
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Trocken
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen