57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multiseason 2 gegen Viking Fourtech gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental SportContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multiseason 2
Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
SportContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
13
5
18
3
16
Optimale Position
#6
#11
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.9
17.0
6.1
3.7
1.2
Neuester Test
2025
2021
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
61
32
47
36
124

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multiseason 2
77%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multiseason 2
66%
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental SportContact 7
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multiseason 2
48%
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Schnee
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Schneetraktion
Firestone Multiseason 2
87%
Viking Fourtech
51%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Firestone Multiseason 2
86%
Viking Fourtech
82%
Schnee Handling
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Komfort
Firestone Multiseason 2
73%
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
Komfort
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
81%
Kosten
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Multiseason 2
79%
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Trocken
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental SportContact 7
96%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental SportContact 7
94%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen