57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multiseason 2 gegen Viking Fourtech gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multiseason 2
Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
13
5
18
28
1
Optimale Position
#6
#11
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.9
17.0
6.1
2.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2025
2021
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
61
32
47
68
66

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multiseason 2
77%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multiseason 2
66%
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multiseason 2
48%
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Schnee
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Schneetraktion
Firestone Multiseason 2
87%
Viking Fourtech
51%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Firestone Multiseason 2
86%
Viking Fourtech
82%
Schnee Handling
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Kosten
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Multiseason 2
79%
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Komfort
Firestone Multiseason 2
73%
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Trocken
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen