57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multiseason 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Firestone
Multiseason 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
13
18
4
1
3
Optimale Position
#6
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.9
6.1
3.3
1.0
1.3
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
61
47
40
66
23

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multiseason 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multiseason 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multiseason 2
48%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Schnee
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Firestone Multiseason 2
86%
Schnee Handling
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Schneetraktion
Firestone Multiseason 2
87%
Komfort
Firestone Multiseason 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Komfort
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Kosten
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Multiseason 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Trocken
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen