57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Vredestein Ultrac Pro gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Vredestein Ultrac ProPremium
VredesteinVredestein

Ultrac Pro

7.4
R18 – R23
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
10
18
28
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
7.6
6.1
2.3
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
87
47
67

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Reifen für ElektroautosBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Auch vergleichen

Firestone Multihawk 2 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageFirestone Multihawk 2 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Firestone Multihawk 2 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HMFirestone Multihawk 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs Vredestein Ultrac VortiVredestein Ultrac Pro vs Continental SportContact 7Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich