57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Nokian Powerproof 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Nokian
Powerproof 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
3
4
18
1
4
3
Optimale Position
#12
#6
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
9.0
12.0
6.1
1.0
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2025
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
91
111
47
66
40
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen