57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Michelin Primacy 5Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 5

8.4
R16 – R21
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Continental UltraContact NXTPremium
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact NXT

9.5
R16 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
3
3
3
18
2
3
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
4.7
3.7
3.3
6.1
1.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2025
2026
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
126
34
40
47
23
40

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich