57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Michelin Primacy 4+Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 4+

7.6
R16 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4Premium
PirelliPirelli

P ZERO PZ4

9.1
R13 – R23
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Anzahl der Tests
1
13
3
1
18
3
14
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#2
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
4.3
3.3
1.0
6.1
3.7
5.5
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2026
2025
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
123
40
64
47
34
706

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich