Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

Michelin

Auch vergleichen mit

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Multihawk 2

Primacy 4+

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Anzahl der Tests

1

13

5

3

1

18

3

Optimale Position

#12

#1

#2

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

4.3

2.2

3.3

1.0

6.1

3.3

Neuester Test

2018

2025

2026

2025

2024

2026

Verfügbare Größen

60

123

63

40

64

47

40

Nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

65%

Michelin Primacy 4+

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - quer

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

Michelin Primacy 4+

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Handling - nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

50%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Aquaplaning - längs

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Nassbremsen

Firestone Multihawk 2

74%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Kreisbahn nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Kosten

Firestone Multihawk 2

73%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kilometerstand

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

Michelin Primacy 4+

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Komfort

Firestone Multihawk 2

75%

Michelin Primacy 4+

86%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Außengeräusch

Firestone Multihawk 2

54%

Michelin Primacy 4+

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Innengeräusche

Firestone Multihawk 2

89%

Michelin Primacy 4+

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Trocken

Firestone Multihawk 2

97%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Multihawk 2

Primacy 4+

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nass

Kosten

Komfort

Trocken

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen