57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
13
18
5
4
5
3
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
4.3
6.1
2.8
3.3
2.2
3.7
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
123
47
139
40
63
36

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen