57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
5
18
4
5
5
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
2.8
6.1
3.3
2.2
2.8
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2026
2024
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
111
139
47
40
63
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen