56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
1
18
3
3
26
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
1.0
6.1
3.7
3.3
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2025
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
111
64
47
34
40
66

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich