Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

Michelin

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Multihawk 2

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 5

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Anzahl der Tests

1

4

3

18

5

3

5

Optimale Position

#12

#3

#2

#1

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

3.3

4.7

6.1

2.2

3.7

2.2

Neuester Test

2018

2025

2026

2024

2025

Verfügbare Größen

60

111

40

126

47

63

34

63

Nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Kreisbahn nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning - quer

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Handling - nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

50%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - längs

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Nassbremsen

Firestone Multihawk 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Kosten

Firestone Multihawk 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Kilometerstand

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Komfort

Firestone Multihawk 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Außengeräusch

Firestone Multihawk 2

54%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Trocken

Firestone Multihawk 2

97%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Multihawk 2

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 5

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Nass

Kosten

Komfort

Trocken

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen