57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Michelin Primacy 5Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 5

8.4
R16 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
3
3
18
3
26
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
3.3
4.7
6.1
3.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2026
2026
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
111
40
126
47
34
66

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich