56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Michelin Primacy 5Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 5

8.4
R16 – R21
Continental UltraContact NXTPremium
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact NXT

9.5
R16 – R20
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
3
18
3
2
18
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#1
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
3.3
6.1
4.7
1.0
6.1
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2026
2024
2026
2025
2024
Verfügbare Größen
60
111
40
47
126
23
47

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich