58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
4
18
15
5
29
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
3.3
6.1
9.0
2.2
2.3
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2026
2024
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
111
40
47
226
63
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
70%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.