56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Primacy 5
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
3
18
3
3
26
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
3.3
6.1
3.7
4.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2026
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
111
40
47
34
126
66

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich