56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
3
3
18
1
26
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#2
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
3.3
3.7
6.1
1.0
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2026
2025
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
111
40
34
47
64
66

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich