57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Pirelli Cinturato (C3) gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Pirelli
Cinturato (C3)
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
18
7
3
4
5
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
6.1
2.7
3.7
3.3
2.8
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2024
2026
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
111
47
31
36
40
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
92%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
84%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
94%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
88%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
75%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
74%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen