57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Pirelli Cinturato (C3) gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Pirelli
Cinturato (C3)
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
18
3
7
4
1
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
6.1
3.7
2.7
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
111
47
36
31
40
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen