57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

8.5
R17 – R22
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
5
18
28
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
4.4
6.1
2.3
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
99
47
67

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Reifen für ElektroautosBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Auch vergleichen

Firestone Multihawk 2 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageFirestone Multihawk 2 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Firestone Multihawk 2 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HMFirestone Multihawk 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Kumho Ecsta PS71Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Firestone Roadhawk 2Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Firestone Firehawk SportKumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich