57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
10
4
18
3
5
1
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#3
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.0
12.0
6.1
3.3
2.2
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2025
2024
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
104
111
47
40
63
64

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich