57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
10
4
18
5
3
1
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#3
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.0
12.0
6.1
2.2
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2025
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
104
111
47
63
40
64

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich