57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
10
18
4
5
3
1
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#3
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.0
6.1
12.0
2.2
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2024
2025
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
104
47
111
63
40
64

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich