57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
10
18
4
13
5
3
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#2
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.0
6.1
3.3
4.3
2.2
3.7
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
109
47
40
123
63
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen