56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
10
3
18
3
3
1
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#2
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.0
3.7
6.1
3.3
3.7
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2025
2024
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
104
34
47
40
34
64

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich