57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
10
3
18
28
4
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#2
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.0
3.7
6.1
2.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2025
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
109
36
47
67
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen