57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
1
4
13
18
28
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#2
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
1.0
3.3
4.3
6.1
2.3
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2026
2025
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
66
40
123
47
67

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen