Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Semperit Speed-Life 3 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Multihawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Speed-Life 3

Efficient Grip Performance 2

PremiumContact 6

e.Ziex

Anzahl der Tests

1

3

14

18

36

3

Optimale Position

#12

#2

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

3.3

18.1

6.1

3.1

3.7

Neuester Test

2018

2026

2024

2023

2025

Verfügbare Größen

60

40

116

47

296

34

Nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Continental PremiumContact 6

84%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - längs

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Continental PremiumContact 6

79%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Nassbremsen

Firestone Multihawk 2

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Continental PremiumContact 6

91%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Kreisbahn nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Continental PremiumContact 6

87%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning - quer

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Continental PremiumContact 6

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Handling - nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

50%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Continental PremiumContact 6

87%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Komfort

Firestone Multihawk 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Continental PremiumContact 6

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Außengeräusch

Firestone Multihawk 2

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Continental PremiumContact 6

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Innengeräusche

Firestone Multihawk 2

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Continental PremiumContact 6

80%

Trocken

Firestone Multihawk 2

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Continental PremiumContact 6

90%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Firestone Multihawk 2

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

69%

Continental PremiumContact 6

81%

Kosten

Firestone Multihawk 2

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Continental PremiumContact 6

79%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

Firestone Multihawk 2

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Continental PremiumContact 6

83%

Kilometerstand

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Continental PremiumContact 6

85%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Semperit Speed-Life 3 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Multihawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Speed-Life 3

Efficient Grip Performance 2

PremiumContact 6

e.Ziex

Testprofil

Nass

Komfort

Trocken

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen