57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
5
18
4
28
6
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#1
#3
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
4.8
6.1
12.0
2.3
4.7
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2026
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
40
158
47
111
68
146

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen