57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
13
5
1
18
5
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#1
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
4.3
2.2
1.0
6.1
4.8
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2025
2025
2025
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
40
123
63
66
47
158

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen