57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
13
18
1
5
5
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#1
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
4.3
6.1
1.0
2.2
4.8
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2025
2024
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
40
123
47
66
63
158

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Michelin Primacy 5
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen