56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
3
4
18
5
26
3
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#3
#1
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
12.0
6.1
2.2
2.2
3.7
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2025
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
40
111
47
63
66
34

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich