56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
3
4
18
3
26
1
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#3
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
12.0
6.1
3.7
2.2
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2025
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
40
111
47
34
66
64

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Hankook ION Evo
97%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich