57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
3
10
18
4
6
1
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#2
#1
#3
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
6.0
6.1
12.0
4.7
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2026
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
40
104
47
111
146
64

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich