57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
10
6
18
28
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#2
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
6.0
4.7
6.1
2.3
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2026
2026
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
40
109
146
47
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen