57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Prime 4 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
14
18
4
1
5
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#2
#1
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
6.3
6.1
12.0
1.0
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2026
2024
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
40
532
47
111
66
63

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen