Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Turanza 6 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Multihawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Turanza 6

Efficientgrip Performance 2

P ZERO PZ4

Anzahl der Tests

1

3

1

18

13

3

14

Optimale Position

#12

#2

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

3.3

1.0

6.1

6.2

3.3

5.5

Neuester Test

2018

2026

2025

2024

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

60

40

64

47

225

40

706

Nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Kreisbahn nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

73%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Aquaplaning - quer

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Handling - nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

50%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

75%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Aquaplaning - längs

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Nassbremsen

Firestone Multihawk 2

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

70%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Kosten

Firestone Multihawk 2

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Kilometerstand

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

70%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

Komfort

Firestone Multihawk 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Außengeräusch

Firestone Multihawk 2

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

65%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Innengeräusche

Firestone Multihawk 2

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

51%

Trocken

Firestone Multihawk 2

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Turanza 6 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Multihawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Turanza 6

Efficientgrip Performance 2

P ZERO PZ4

Testprofil

Nass

Kosten

Komfort

Trocken

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen