57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Michelin
e.Primacy
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
18
5
4
23
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#1
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
6.1
4.8
12.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
40
47
158
111
192

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
100%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen