57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
18
13
1
28
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
6.1
4.3
1.0
2.3
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2024
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
40
47
123
66
67

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen